Why Cities Lose, Jonathan A. Rodden
Why Cities Lose, Jonathan A. Rodden
List: $19.99 | Sale: $13.99
Club: $9.99

Why Cities Lose
The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide

Author: Jonathan A. Rodden

Narrator: Mike Lenz

Unabridged: 10 hr 13 min

Format: Digital Audiobook Download

Publisher: Tantor Media

Published: 07/07/2020


Synopsis

A prizewinning political scientist traces the origins of urban-rural political conflict and shows how geography shapes elections in America and beyond.

Why is it so much easier for the Democratic Party to win the national popular vote than to build and maintain a majority in Congress? Why can Democrats sweep statewide offices in places like Pennsylvania and Michigan yet fail to take control of the same states' legislatures? Many place exclusive blame on partisan gerrymandering and voter suppression. But as political scientist Jonathan A. Rodden demonstrates in Why Cities Lose, the left's electoral challenges have deeper roots in economic and political geography.

In the late nineteenth century, support for the left began to cluster in cities among the industrial working class. Today, left-wing parties have become coalitions of diverse urban interest groups, from racial minorities to the creative class. These parties win big in urban districts but struggle to capture the suburban and rural seats necessary for legislative majorities. A bold new interpretation of today's urban-rural political conflict, Why Cities Lose also points to electoral reforms that could address the left's under-representation while reducing urban-rural polarization.

About Jonathan A. Rodden

Jonathan A. Rodden is professor of political science and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and founder and director of the Stanford Spatial Social Science Lab. The author of the prizewinning Hamilton's Paradox, he lives in Stanford, California.


Reviews

Goodreads review by Soren on June 25, 2019

Really valuable book about urban/rural political divides in the US and the anglosphere. Makes some wonderful comparative points about why the European democracies turned to proportional representation and why the US didn't. It makes a compelling argument that advocates of redistricting reform will g......more

Goodreads review by Jack on July 10, 2019

Some of it is a bit heckling and other a bit repetitive. The entire quagmire is neither black or white; suburban, city or county; slavery, farming or industry--It is more complicated but this book is a good start.......more

Goodreads review by Gaetano on December 26, 2021

Taxation Without Representation: The Structural, Blatant, Anti-Democratic Bias for Rural-Conservative Representation Most everyone is aware of the ills of gerrymandered districts, but few talk about the deep structural bias that persists even with perfectly neutral districts. Rodden is one of the few......more

Goodreads review by Joe on December 25, 2021

The point of the book is true in that the structure of first-past-the-post electoral districts makes it nearly impossible for the urban left to be represented in government but the author spends comparably little time evaluating alternatives to this structure, instead focusing on silly ideas like Ne......more

Goodreads review by Russell on May 15, 2020

This turned out to be a much more quantitative work of political science than I expected it to be, and strongly comparative to, and of course in a lot of ways those are virtues. For me, since I simply was unable to follow some of the math which Rodden was making use of, parts of the book dragged. Bu......more