Quotes
“[Marsden’s] critique of the consensus culture of the 1950s
is original and persuasive, and he is dead right to contend, with [Abraham]
Kuyper and his intellectual heirs, that the idea of ‘neutrality’ is a sham. Mr.
Marsden’s book won’t bring resolution to the conflicts over abortion or
same-sex marriage, but his reflections should remind us that America is still
ours: We don’t have to take it back.” Wall Street Journal
“Under the surface of a seemingly placid era roiled a cauldron of doubts and discontent, according to this penetrating study of post-war intellectual ferment…Marsden’s erudite, sophisticated, but very accessible study reveals the suppressed spiritual hunger of a secular age.” Publishers Weekly
“Marsden employs historical analysis to suggest why the United States is so badly split between secular-oriented intellectuals and religiously doctrinaire church leaders, a split that seems to have harmed the nations moral character, forged during World War II…An important discourse.” Kirkus Reviews
“This remarkable book
gives us an insightful narrative of how we have gotten to our present failure
to manage increasingly diverse cultural realities in North
America. Marsden charts the various efforts over several decades in the
last century to sustain a pluralism on the basis of a cultural consensus—both
‘atheists for Niebuhr’ and the New Religious Right had their own versions of
this project. In exposing the underlying reasons for their failure, Marsden
points the way to a challenging but exciting journey toward a truly inclusive
pluralism.” Richard J. Mouw, professor, Fuller Theological Seminary
“George Marsden’s learned and accessible analysis
of the intellectual culture of the 1950s is must reading for anyone trying to
make sense of our current debates over religion in American public life.” John Fea, Messiah College, author of Was America Founded as a Christian Nation?
“In this compact but powerful analysis of
American life and thought in the years since the Second World War, George Marsden
shows why neither a triumphant secular liberalism nor a restored religious
consensus can serve as a rallying point for national unity. Instead, he makes a
case for a pluralism that treats the widest possible range of religious and
nonreligious perspectives as equally deserving of protections and recognition,
and rejects the privatization of religious speech and expression. The result is
a book that is as much about dawning as about twilight, one that not only
provides a fresh and compelling view of postwar America, but offers a fresh
vision of the road ahead.” Wilfred M. McClay, University of Oklahoma
