State of Fear

I struggled with this novel a lot. I am still struggling with this novel now, which is part of the reason for writing this review. The story itself, notwithstanding the science/climate change aspects, is thin at best and non-existent at worst. Nearly every story aspect is as predictable as the neon/LED of Vegas. Characters are as unremarkable as the story itself and offer no reader connectivity. By the end of the novel I was mostly glad to be finished with the book; however the audio book had two additions that caught me off guard. The “Message from the Author” was far more interesting than the entire novel even though it was only 15 minutes. If Crichton had begun the novel with the message than I think it would have been more enjoyable as in the message he explains something that I kind of agree with which is people need to look past the headlines/articles/etc. and focus on the substance of the data/data collection methods an entirely new perspective becomes available outside “Climate Change is Real/Fake” to “What are we really looking at”. The other part of the novel that I am glad for is the “Appendix One” wherein Crichton includes information on the “Eugenics” movement and its utter disappearance from history as well as how the scientific/political/entertainment community championed it. Additionally information was provided on other such movements in which humans were/are harmed regularly in the name of science/politics/power. Ultimately if you are looking for “Jurassic Park”, “Timeline”, “Congo”, “Andromeda Strain” … this is not that type of book. It is very politicized/science questioning and watered down story that, though still not Crichton’s usual quality, if read in the “Message” and “Appendix” first model can be seen as a way to really challenge beliefs that may not have the legitimacy one might think those beliefs might have.

I remain scared. A physicist murdered in strange circumstances in Paris, a deadly innovative technology changing hands in Malaysia, an uncommon type of submarine released in the waters in Vancouver; everything points to an underground eco-terrorist organization and a massive worldwide conspiracy b......more

Chrichton is superficially playing with ethical and political ideas in one of his worst novels. Others weren´t really good too, but at least he avoided showing that he didn´t do his homework when dealing with an important topic. I don´t know why Chrichton integrated climate change activists as a key......more

3.5 stars I can’t believe that I am sitting here thinking about this review while Hurricane Sandy’s imminence is being trumpeted just outside my door. Makes you think….. The story itself is about global warming. It’s a cautionary tale really. On the one hand you have some radical environmentalists/ sci......more

Exciting book! I've read it 3 times now. Definitely read the author's message at the end, it's really interesting.......more

I was torn between a 2 or 3, but decided to go with the former. There is so much ranting about global warming in this book that the plot takes a back seat majority of the time. For a while you kind of forget that this is supposed to be a thriller and not a debate. I think what ultimately led me to g......more